Assignment 2: Peer Review Annotated Bib Peer Review Name* First Last Your peer partner's name* The BasicsDid your partner’s annotated bib and process log meet requirements? Go through this check list to let them know. Please check all that apply.* The annotated bibliography contains 5 sources. Each source is a SCHOLARLY source (i.e. not a newspaper article, blog post, website, etc.) Each annotation contains a correctly formatted citation (MLA, APA, or Chicago formatting is OK.) Each annotation is between 150-250 words, not including the citation itself. Each annotation contains a paraphrase of the research questions that is not too close to the original text. Each annotation discusses the method that the original authors of the source used to conduct their research Each annotation discusses information about the findings of the research Each annotation shows how this source connects to your partner’s research question. At least a few of the annotations show how they’re connected to other annotations on this list. There is a process log. The process log answers the appropriate questions in sufficient detail. If you did not check a box above, please explain why not. If you checked all boxes, you can just write "I checked all boxes."*SourcesUse this part of the form to reflect on the sources that your partner selected. Look at each abstract for each source that your partner found. Compare the abstract to your partner's summaries in their annotations. Are there any annotations that are too closely copying the original text?*Copy and paste any direct quotes that you partner integrated into their entries into this box. Are all of these quotes integrated correctly?*Discuss why each of the sources included on this list are scholarly. You don't have to discuss each source individually if there are multiple sources that fall into the same category (i.e. multiple journal articles.)*Describe the connections that your partner is making between each of their sources and their research question.*Please check all that apply. Each citation on the list contains:* There’s a properly formatted heading and a title at the top. The title is something that relates to this project and is not “Annotated Bibliography” or “Assignment 3”, etc. All of the necessary components for the type of citation (journal article, book, etc.) Each citation on the list is in the same citation style (e.g. MLA, APA, Chicago, etc.) Citations are alphabetized Each citation contains a hanging indent No bold or underlined portions of the citations If you did not check a box above, please explain why not:*The Process LogUse this part of the form to reflect on your partner’s process log. Open a new window, and look back at the prompt for this assignment (link is below, but please note that if you open it in this same window, your progress will not be saved.) Does your partner answer the questions in the Process Log portion of the prompt?*The annotated bib prompt: https://110spring23.commons.gc.cuny.edu/annotated-bibliography-and-process-log/Are there any places in the Process Log that left you confused or where the explanation could use more detail?*What was similar or different about your partner's approach to completing the Annotated Bibliography and your own approach to it?*General StuffThis is the last bit of the form! What is something that you learned from reading your partner's draft? It could be about the draft itself, the formatting, the process log, or about the topic.*What is something that you want to know more about after reading your partner's draft?*Anything else you would like for your partner to know? Words of encouragement? A great "power through the edits" song recommendation? This is optional. Δ This entry is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.